The Moment
Dr. Phil has officially entered the Brian Walshe chat – and he’s not exactly holding back.
In a new interview, the TV personality walks through what he sees as the dark psychology of Brian Walshe, the Massachusetts man currently on trial for allegedly murdering his wife, Ana Walshe, who vanished in early 2023. According to a December 2025 report from TMZ, Dr. Phil labels Walshe a “narcissistic sociopath” and claims Walshe fixated on porn involving cheating wives after he suspected Ana of having an affair.
Brian Walshe — the Massachusetts man on trial for allegedly murdering his wife Ana — is a narcissistic sociopath who reveled in watching cheating wife porn after he suspected his spouse of stepping out on him … according to Dr. Phil. pic.twitter.com/umV1AAEACH
— Ernesto Abreu (@ernestolabreu) December 5, 2025
TMZ says Dr. Phil believes Walshe used these videos to reinforce a twisted sense of himself as the true victim and to fuel revenge fantasies – instead of, say, confronting the real-life issues in his marriage like a functioning adult.
Phil also points to Walshe’s earlier art fraud conviction – involving fake Andy Warhol paintings – as proof he can “hurt and deceive” people, suggesting the same mentality could extend to his marriage. Meanwhile, the trial rolls on, with testimony that Ana allegedly was having an affair before she disappeared.
So now we have a high-profile murder trial, a missing woman, a husband accused of killing her, and a famous TV doctor diagnosing him from the sidelines. Welcome to 2025, where true crime isn’t just a genre – it’s a spectator sport.
The Take
I have two reactions here, and they’re pulling in opposite directions.
On one hand, everything we know about this case is chilling. A wife disappears on New Year’s Day 2023; her body is never found; prosecutors say her husband lied to investigators and Googled how to dispose of a body. Now we’re hearing in court that she may have been having an affair – and that he allegedly binged “cheating wife” porn while stewing in resentment. Nobody wins in this story. Especially not Ana.
On the other hand, watching Dr. Phil diagnose Brian Walshe as a “narcissistic sociopath” through the media feels… a little too made-for-TV. It’s like turning a real woman’s disappearance into a personality quiz.
Is Walshe capable of manipulation? The federal art fraud conviction says yes. Is he legally presumed innocent of murder until there’s a verdict? Also yes. But in the pop-culture court of public opinion, labels like “narcissist” and “sociopath” hit harder than almost anything the jury will hear.
This is where the line gets fuzzy. Dr. Phil – a former clinical psychologist who built an empire dissecting people’s behavior on daytime TV – knows exactly how powerful those words are. When he tells a camera that someone like Walshe sees himself as the wounded party and might think, “If you don’t want me, you’re not going to have anybody,” that sticks.
Is that helpful context for people trying to understand relationship abuse and control? Maybe. Is it also ratings-friendly armchair diagnosis of a man he hasn’t publicly evaluated, in a case that’s still being tried? Absolutely.
It’s a bit like watching a house burn while a contractor runs a commercial in front of it: “See this disaster? Let me tell you how I’d fix your foundation.” The real tragedy – Ana Walshe’s disappearance and presumed death – risks becoming a backdrop for a personality profile.
And then there’s the porn angle. Yes, it’s relevant if it came up in digital evidence. Yes, it fits the story people want to hear about jealousy and revenge. But we should be honest that sexual shame and lurid details are also catnip for the true-crime machine. It’s not just about justice; it’s also about clicks and attention.
Receipts
Confirmed:
- Ana Walshe, a Massachusetts mother of three, was reported missing in early January 2023 after failing to appear for a flight from Boston to Washington, D.C., according to police and court records widely reported at the time.
- Brian Walshe, her husband, was later charged with her murder in Massachusetts, along with related charges including misleading police; he has pleaded not guilty to the murder charge. (Based on court filings and coverage by major news outlets in January 2023.)
- Before Ana’s disappearance, Brian Walshe pleaded guilty in federal court to an art fraud scheme involving fake Andy Warhol paintings, as documented in federal court records and reported in 2021-2022.
- According to a December 5, 2025 article from TMZ, Dr. Phil gave an on-camera interview about the ongoing murder trial and called Walshe a “narcissistic sociopath.”
- The same TMZ report states that a man identified as William Fastow testified in court that he was having an extramarital affair with Ana Walshe before she vanished.
Unverified / Opinion-Based (Not Established as Fact in Court):
- The specific claim that Walshe watched “cheating wife” porn to reinforce his sense of victimhood and plot revenge is described in the TMZ piece largely through Dr. Phil’s framing; it is not presented there as a formal diagnostic finding.
- Dr. Phil’s label of Walshe as a “narcissistic sociopath” is his professional opinion as a TV commentator, not a court finding or publicly documented clinical evaluation.
- Any specific motive for Ana’s alleged murder – including jealousy, revenge, or reaction to an affair – remains a prosecution theory until proven at trial.
Backstory (For Casual Readers)
If you’re only half-following this, here’s the quick rewind. Ana Walshe, a corporate real estate executive and mother of three, vanished around New Year’s Day 2023. Her husband, Brian Walshe, told police she’d left for work. Investigators say that story quickly fell apart. According to earlier court filings, prosecutors claim Brian bought cleaning supplies, disposed of a bloody rug, and made disturbing internet searches about dismembering and disposing of a body. Ana’s remains have never been found.

Brian was already dealing with legal trouble: a federal art-fraud case involving fake Warhols. After months of investigation, Massachusetts prosecutors charged him with Ana’s murder. As of my latest available information, no murder conviction had been reached; he remains legally presumed innocent while the trial plays out.
What’s Next
In the near term, all eyes stay on the courtroom, not the TV cameras. Day five of testimony is set to continue, and we can expect more focus on:
- Digital forensics: Search histories, phone data, and any adult content usage the prosecution thinks supports a motive or state of mind.
- Relationship history: More on the alleged affair, the couple’s finances, and any prior signs of control, abuse, or separation plans.
- Defense strategy: How Brian Walshe’s lawyers counter the narrative of jealousy, narcissism, and manipulation that’s now being amplified by media personalities.
- Public spin: Don’t be surprised if other talking heads jump in with their own “profiles” of Walshe. True crime has become its own ecosystem, and big trials like this feed it.
The real question is whether all this noise makes it harder to remember the heart of the case: a woman who vanished, three children without their mother, and a legal system that has to sort through evidence – not soundbites – to decide what happened.
Sources: Court filings and coverage of the Ana and Brian Walshe case reported by major U.S. outlets in January 2023; federal court records on Brian Walshe’s art fraud plea (2021-2022); TMZ interview and trial report featuring Dr. Phil, published December 5, 2025.
What do you think: Should TV “experts” be publicly diagnosing high-profile defendants during an active murder trial, or does that cross a line for you?
Comments